Road Infrastructure Analysis · Tri-State Region

Big Budget,
Bottom Roads

New York has the largest road network in the tri-state region but invests the least per mile — while spending nearly 5× the national average on administrative overhead. The result: roads ranked 45th out of 50 states.

01Capital Spending & Road Network
StateRoad CapitalPublic Road MilesSpending / MileContext
New York$3.5B114,274$30,600 / miLargest network in the region. Spend diluted across vast rural upstate mileage. Lowest per-mile of the three states.
New Jersey$1.8B~39,000~$46,200 / miCompact, dense network. Moderate per-mile spend with decent outcomes.
Connecticut$2.1B21,478$97,800 / miSmallest network, highest concentration of spend. 3.2× more per mile than NY.

Capital figures represent total road & bridge investment (state + federal) for FY/CY 2025. NJ figure is estimated road-only allocation from NJDOT capital program. Road mileage from FHWA Highway Statistics 2023 (Table HM-20).

45th

New York's overall highway ranking out of 50 states

Reason Foundation 28th Annual Highway Report (2022 data)

02Highway Performance Rankings

Rankings from the Reason Foundation's 28th Annual Highway Report (2025, using 2022 FHWA data). Lower rank = worse performance. Arrows show change from 27th report.

CategoryNew YorkNew JerseyConnecticut
Overall Ranking45th
↑4 from 49th
34th
↑10 from 44th
13th
↓8 from 5th
Urban Interstate Pavement48th43rd15th
Urban Arterial Pavement47th41st28th
Structurally Deficient Bridges40th30th21st
Urbanized Area Congestion47th50th32nd
23.7%
NY roads in poor condition
FHWA / ConsumerAffairs
~8–10%
NJ roads in poor condition
Reason Foundation est.
20.4%
CT roads in poor condition
FHWA / ConsumerAffairs

Note: CT has a high “poor condition” percentage but ranks 13th overall due to strong urban interstate and bridge performance.

03Where New York's Money Goes

Per-lane-mile spending ratios from the Reason Foundation's 27th Annual Highway Report (2020 FHWA data). These ratios show how NY's disbursements compare to the national average and peer states.

Spending CategoryNY vs. National AvgNY vs. ILNY vs. PAAssessment
Capital & Bridge
Disbursements / lane-mile
1.57× national avg1.3×1.7×High, but partially explained by urban density and NYC construction costs.
Maintenance
Disbursements / lane-mile
1.94× national avg2.3×1.6×Severe overspend with no commensurate improvement in road quality.
“Other”
Admin, overhead, non-construction
4.92× national avg9.3×3.0×Ranked 50th — dead last in the 27th report. Bureaucratic overhead consuming the road budget.

New Jersey: Construction costs rank among the nation's highest per lane-mile, but administrative efficiency is meaningfully better than NY (ranked 10th vs. NY's 40th in the 28th report).

Connecticut: Asset management approach explicitly designed to stretch dollars — CTDOT credits it with halving the share of bridges in poor condition.

4.9×

NY overhead vs. national average

9.3×

NY overhead vs. Illinois

04Structural Funding Gaps
State10-Year Bridge Funding GapTrajectory
New York$11B — largest in nation
Needs $17B over 10 years, only $6B in available funding.
Catch-up mode. Decades of deferral compound repair costs exponentially.
New JerseyModerateImproved 10+ spots in recent Reason Foundation rankings. Positive trend — was 50th five years ago, now 34th.
ConnecticutActively closingBridge poor-condition rate cut from 13% to 7.5%. NHS bridge count dropped from 231 to 209.
Verdict
New York

Invests the least per mile of the three states while ranking 45th nationally. Administrative overhead consumes nearly 5× the national average. Holds the largest bridge maintenance backlog in the country at $11 billion.

Verdict
New Jersey

Construction costs among the highest nationally, but administrative efficiency far exceeds NY. Ranks 34th — improving rapidly from 50th five years ago. Meaningfully better than NY on every quality metric.

Verdict
Connecticut

Spends $97,800/mile — 3.2× New York's rate — on a small, concentrated network. Asset management delivers results: ranked 13th nationally, bridge deficiency halved.

Sources & Methodology

Reason Foundation, 28th Annual Highway Report (2025, using 2022 FHWA data) — overall and category rankings

Reason Foundation, 27th Annual Highway Report (2024, using 2020 FHWA data) — per-lane-mile spending ratios

FHWA Highway Statistics 2023, Table HM-20 — public road mileage

Pew Charitable Trusts, TAMP Analysis (Jul 2025) — bridge funding gap estimates

NYSDOT FY2025 Capital Plan · NJDOT FY2025 Capital Program · CTDOT FY2025 Capital Program

ConsumerAffairs / FHWA — road condition percentages